It started as the combination of two ideas:
- How all opinions and objects are entangled and interconnected
- How “always” is never really stable – it’s always prone to transition
Then, I merged these two ideas. It was more personal in the beginning, with the words being very close to my keywords. I was talking about personal shift – my change that allowed me to make this ring. But I was also being general. As you can see, I was very confused myself, on what my concept was.
It became clearer when I changed the words and added a paragraph, I clarified my idea to be the simply the idea of how opinions are all entangled in a sense that one can become another, as well as that opposing sides may have similarities. And therefore, that nothing is really “always.” We are in a state of change – whether that may be opinions, commitment, or beliefs.